He touched the screen for gubernatorial candidate Jim Davis, a Democrat, but the review screen repeatedly registered the Republican, Charlie Crist.
There have been no cases of a vote for a Republican being mistaken as a vote for a Democrat. If it is indeed a "bug", then that "bug" is a Republican. Why can't the US of A take a lesson from Canada and stick to paper voting? Sure, if they really wanted to rig the election they could change the vote after the confirmation screen, but that would make it awful hard to have plausible deniability now, wouldn't it? There are enough careless, not to mention stupid, people in this world that a glitch here and there is enough to swing a vote. This coming election promises to be a circus.
The issue seems to be with the touch screens, which seems like an innocent enough excuse, but ATMs use touch screens... how often do they give you $40 when you ask for $60?
2 comments:
Nice post. There's obviously something fishy going on here, and I hope that this election isn't going to be as corrupt as previous ones.
Congratulations, You are the winner of Questions and Answers.. Tomorrow's post will announce you as the winner. Thanks again for your participation.
p.s Wonderful articles.
Post a Comment